*NEW RELEASE SPECIAL* Review of NETGALLEY arc Lady Hotspur by Tessa Gratton #Brainfluffbookreview #LadyHotspurbookreview

Standard

It was the blurb that attracted me – a retelling of Shakespeare’s Henry IV sold this one. I studied the play at school and it sank into my soul. What I hadn’t realised is that this is the second book set in this world of Innis Lear as neither Goodreads or Amazon mention it. However, I think reading The Queens of Innis Lear would have helped enormously. So before picking this one up, go and track down the first book.

BLURB: Hal was once a knight, carefree and joyous, sworn to protect her future queen Banna Mora. But after a rebellion led by her own mother, Caleda, Hal is now the prince of Lionis, heir to the throne. The pressure of her crown and bloody memories of war plague her, as well as a need to shape her own destiny, no matter the cost. Lady Hotspur, known as the Wolf of Aremoria for her temper and warcraft, never expected to be more than a weapon. She certainly never expected to fall in love with the fiery Hal or be blindsided by an angry Queen’s promise to remake the whole world in her own image—a plan Hotspur knows will lead to tragedy. Banna Mora kept her life, but not her throne. Fleeing to Innis Lear to heal her heart and plot revenge, the stars and roots of Innis Lear will teach her that the only way to survive a burning world is to learn to breathe fire. These three women, together or apart, are the ones who have the power to bring the once-powerful Aremoria back to life—or destroy it forever.

Unusually, I’ve included the full blurb as it neatly sums up the dynamic of the plot about three young women who were once firm friends, as their relationships change into a more complex dynamic that has consequences not just for them, but for two kingdoms. This long book (600+ pages) is very ambitious, given it claims to be a retelling of one of the Shakespeare history plays. While there are echoes of that dynamic, I wouldn’t get too hung up on that thread, as there are also important differences that occur very quickly.

It took me a bit of time to really bond with the characters, but then I hadn’t appreciated that this was the second book and I recommend you read the first one before tackling Lady Hotspur. The title is actually misleading as the book equally deals with Prince Hal and Bana Mora just as much as Hotspur. It covers their joint and individual journeys extremely well. Gratton is an accomplished author who drew me into a world of complex magic and layered characterisation so that despite the heftiness of the read, I was held throughout. I was all set to give this one a ten, before I got to the final act and that crucial defining battle…

As I don’t want to lurch into Spoiler territory, you’ll have to bear with me if I’m a tad vague. But the trajectory of the book charts the relationships and competing claims, both personal and societal, upon three young women who already had high expectations thrust upon them. I felt Gratton did an outstanding job in making those genuinely gripping and very poignant – the relationship between Hotspur and Hal was particularly well done, I felt. But I was very dissatisfied with the manner in which the story was tied up. I think Gratton committed the unpardonable sin of raising reader expectations for one type of outcome, only to pull a switch that didn’t convince me at all. The conclusion was far too tidy for such a tortuous journey – by the end, I wasn’t even sure why they went to war at all, given the outcome.

The other issue I had was the role of women in the story. This magical tale is set in a late medieval setting when political marriages secured dynasties and land and Might is Right. Why we suddenly have a cadre of highborn, marriageable women, able to fight in battle alongside their male counterparts, is never fully explained. And I mind. It seems to me that you cannot sweep away all the impediments to women’s full equality within a story without addressing these obstacles, or factoring in a different dynamic that will give these women some tangible advantage in hand-to-hand fighting. Because their ability to prevail against fully armoured men due to their unique skill never convinced me. And I’m not prepared to go with the flow on this one – what sort of message does that give generations of us who watched our male work colleagues sail past us simply because of their genitalia? That we’re not strong enough? That we need magic? Or that just reading about a cosy world where it’s all just different is going to make me feel better? Systemic inequality of opportunity for women is far too widespread to be treated in such a flippant manner.

Furthermore, it’s supposed to be a retelling of a Shakespearean play. He might have been the greatest playwright that ever lived, but he was still a product of his time – so women were never found on the battlefield fighting alongside their men in his stories. If Gratton had wanted to change that aspect after specifically referencing Shakespeare in her worldbuilding, then she needed to spend at least some time and effort demonstrating what made it possible for these women to be able to learn the martial arts and take part in the bloodletting alongside the men. And she doesn’t.

The really aggravating aspect is that it wouldn’t have taken much to have turned this well-written, but slightly flawed effort into an outstanding read, as far as I’m concerned. And despite my real gripes with the book, I am still awarding it a solid eight. But it could have been a ten with just a little bit more thought… The ebook arc copy of Lady Hotspur was provided by the publisher through NetGalley in return for an honest opinion of the book.
8/10

20 responses »

  1. Lovely, thoughtful review, Sarah. I’ve been curious about this, and I don’t think I knew either that it was a sequel to Innis Lear! Probably won’t be tackling this series simply because I have too much to read already.

  2. Hmm, I absolutely did not realize this was a sequel to The Queens of Innis Lear. I have yet to read that, so maybe I’ll shuffle this ARC a little deeper in the pile while I catch up.

    • Yes – I hadn’t appreciated that fact until I came to write up the review. It certainly accounts for that slight sense of missing something that I felt at the start of the book… I think reading the first one would be a good plan. I look forward to reading your thoughts on it, when you do get a chance to read and review it:))

  3. I was intrigued by this because Henry IV part one is me favourite history (most of the time). But I was hesitant because I didn’t know how this story could be told well based on Hotspur’s fate. I adore Hotspur and will always be team Hotspur and not team Hal. Thank ye kindly for reviewing this book because I now know that this book would have pissed me off. Excellent review.
    x The Captain

    • Thank you, Cap – yes… I love them both – but Henry IV Part 1 is just fabulous – such a breadth of characters. Perhaps because the play is so close to my heart, I was a bit harder on this one. But while there is a lot I really enjoyed, as you can tell, it also pissed me off, too!

  4. I tried to read this one without having read The Queens of Innis Lear and ended up DNFing it since I felt like I was just missing too much information. It does sound pretty good though so maybe I’ll go back and start with the first book and then try again with this one.

    • Yes – I do think it would have helped, though I ploughed on through the floundery bit at the beginning without too much trouble. I’m used to crashing midway into series, so that issue didn’t worry me too much!

  5. I was actually intrigued by the fact it’s supposed to be a retelling of a Shakespearean play, I didn’t realise (as others here, apparently) that it was the sequel of The Queens of Innis Lear, which I still have to read. It sounds like a good one, though, and I loved your review, Sarah!

    • Thank you for your kind praise – but it was blind ignorance that had me blundering into this one. And besides, I do make a hobby of crashing midway into book series, though I am trying to give it up!

  6. If you gave this one such a high rating, despite your well-placed misgivings, then this is a story to keep on my radar: I had already noticed this title because of the striking cover, and did not realize it was a second book, so I will heed your warning…
    Thank you so much for sharing this!!! 👍 😊

    • It is beautifully written – some of the scenes are sublime and Gratton does a wonderful job of portraying a poignantly passionate love affair. I really had a tussle with this one – one one hand I loved it, and the other – it absolutely infuriated me!

  7. I do have the first book still to read (shame on me) and hadn’t realised a second was already so well advanced. Whoops. Shame about the issues you experienced. On the one hand I understand the idea behind changing things to be more inclusive but then on the other hand I find it equally annoying when history is changed but just doesn’t feel plausible. I’m a lover of detail in that respect.
    Lynn 😀

    • Yes! Because just creating a fantasy landscape so that women, or people of colour are now somehow miraculously in positions of agency and power immediately belittles those who have spent their lives struggling against the real-life power dynamic, which is stubbornly staying very unequal.

  8. Thank you for the head’s up about this being a second book. I have this on my TBR pile, but will look for The Queens of Innis Lear to read first. I am glad you enjoyed this one even with the flaws you noted. Your description of the ending of this one brought to mind my feelings about aspects of Roth’s Divergent. I don’t know if you’ve read it so I won’t go into it here. Needless to say there was a similar “what was the point” feeling. And not the obvious complaint so many other readers of the novel had. Anyway, that’s neither here not there. They are completely different books.

    I read with interest your thoughts on the role of women in this novel. You make several good points, and I’ll be curious to know if the same stands out for me when I read it. If a story is compelling enough, I sometimes can gloss right over, but if such digressions are not well explained or accounted for, it’s hard not to be taken out of the story.

    • Thank you for your thoughtful contribution, Wendy. As it happens, I did read ‘Divergent’ and that sense of ‘what was the point’ was my immediate reaction – which was a major reason why I didn’t bother with the other two books, even though a number of folks mentioned they were better than the first book. Though I would say that Gratton is a better writer, anyway…

      As for the role of women in the book, it’s been an increasing bugbear of mine, particularly with regard to fantasy genres. Hence the rant!

  9. I completely agree with you. I’m all for having fun bending the rules of a world to make a unique story, but there’s got to be a *reason* those rules are bent at all. Something must be the catalyst that spurs that bending. If no reason’s provided, then the “specialness” of this rule-bending’s moot. (This is one of the great points of ire among Star Wars fans with Disney, actually…)

    • That’s right! And that acquires extra anger/disgust when that area of specialness features an under-represented section of the population, who in the real world are being denied full equality. Certainly as far as I’m concerned…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.